Policy Shifts in College Admissions: Legacy Ban ExpansionDiversity Adjustments Following Supreme Court Ruling

NEW ITEMS POSTED WILL BE FEATURED AT THE TOP OF THIS LIST. THE INFORMATION WAS LAST UPDATED ON AUGUST 23, 2024.

FILTER OPTIONS:

Student Recruitment

Admissions and Enrollment

Creating Inclusive ClimatesDEI

Legacy Admissions

Graduate School

Hiring and Staff Wellbeing

Financial d and Scholarships

Other

Resource ## Illinois Becomes the Fourth State to Pass Legacy Ban

PublicationOrganization: Inside Higher Ed

Resource Type: Media and Statements

Governor J.B. Pritzker of Illinois has signed legislation that prohibits institutions from using legacy p college admissions, joining Colorado, Virginia, and Maryland as jurisdictions that have made such bans.

Resource ## MIT’s Diversity Impact After Affirmative Action Ban

PublicationOrganization: The New York Times

Resource Type: Media and Statements

MIT's recent data on its first class following the Supreme Court's decision on affirmative action shows a significant decline in enrollment for Black and Latino students, as reported by The New York Times.

Resource ## American Bar Association’s Diversity Rule Adjustments

PublicationOrganization: Reuters

Resource Type: Media and Statements

In response to the Supreme Court ruling, the American Bar Association plans to eliminate references to race and ethnicity from its law school diversity guidelines, according to Reuters coverage.

These resources offer insights into how recent judicial decisions are reshaping higher education practices across various sectors, including admissions policies and diversity initiatives. They highlight diverse impacts on institutions such as MIT and reflect broader changes in the landscape of college admissions following the Supreme Court's ruling.

ACE Resources:

Diversity in Admissions:

Explore strategies for mntning inclusive environments post-SFFA v. Harvard and UNC-Chapel Hill decisions.

SFFA V. Harvard and UNC-CH Diversity in Admissions:

Analyze the implications of these landmark cases on admissions practices and policies.

Statement by ACE President Ted Mitchell on the Supreme Court's Race in Admissions Ruling:

Read the perspective from Ted Mitchell, ACE President, on the Supreme Court’s impact on higher education diversity initiatives.

Issue Brief: The SFFA v. Harvard and UNC Race in Admissions Cases

Understand key points of debate surrounding these cases that significantly altered the admissions process.

dotEDU Live: The Supreme Court’s Ruling on Race and Admissions:

Access discussions and insights from experts providing real-time analysis following the Supreme Court's decision.

ACE leads higher education by orchestrating a unified vision for the future, uniting members to drive change. The Council collaborates across sectors to craft solutions for contemporary challenges, serves diverse student populations effectively, shapes impactful public policy, and promotes an inclusive educational landscape.

Contact Information:

American Council on Education

1 Dupont Circle NW

Washington, DC 20036

Phone: 202 939-9300

ACE fosters cooperation among higher education organizations through the Washington Higher Education Secretariat WHES. For inquiries or additional information about ACE programs and initiatives:

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use
This article is reproduced from: https://www.acenet.edu/Research-Insights/Pages/Post-SFFA-Decision-Resources.aspx

Please indicate when reprinting from: https://www.oq22.com/Study_Abroad_University/High_Education_Updates_Insights_College_Admmissions.html